In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-8100T is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
