In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-8100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 10% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 107 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
107 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
79 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
