In Control, the Core i3-8100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 252 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $237.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
