In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100T is slightly slower than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 20 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 1 year and 20 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
