In Deathloop, the Core i3-8100 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100
- Is 8 years and 27 days newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 8 years and 27 days newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
