In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $228 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 65% cheaper – $120.32 vs $348.52
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $1.42/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
206 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
84%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$348.52
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
41%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
