In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $327 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 73% cheaper – $120.32 vs $447.16
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 11 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 6 years and 11 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
205 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
83%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
32%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
