In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $429 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 78% cheaper – $120.32 vs $548.89
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
204 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
83%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
21%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
26%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
