In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $410 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 77% cheaper – $120.32 vs $529.91
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
205 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
85%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.91
22%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
