In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $167 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 58% cheaper – $120.32 vs $286.95
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $1.19/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 30 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 4 years and 30 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
204 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
85%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$286.95
41%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
