In Deathloop, the Core i3-8100 is same performance as the Core i7-3770. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $39 more expensive!
Core i3-8100
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i7-3770
- Up to 33% cheaper – $80.98 vs $120.32
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Deathloop – $0.36 vs $0.55/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-3770: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$120.32
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
65%
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$80.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770 Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $278.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
