In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slower than the Core i7-14700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700KF
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 11 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 6 years and 11 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-14700KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
205 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
84%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-14700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-14700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
18%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
