In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $183 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 60% cheaper – $120.32 vs $302.97
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $1.25/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
205 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
84%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
39%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
18%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
