In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $250 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 67% cheaper – $120.32 vs $369.99
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $1.54/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-13700
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-13700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
205 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
86%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$369.99
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
38%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
