In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $210 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 64% cheaper – $120.32 vs $329.95
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $1.52/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
205 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
94%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
36%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
38%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
