In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $45 cheaper!
Core i3-8100
- Up to 27% cheaper – $120.32 vs $165.17
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall – $0.58 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100 vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
204 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
97%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.17
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
74%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100 vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
