In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-7350K is faster than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7350K
- Up to 17% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 120 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 60 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-7350K vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7350K vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7350K vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7350K Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
60W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
