The Core i3-7350K is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7502 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $855.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-7350K
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 96% cheaper – $39.99 vs $895.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 60 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 4 threads
Core i3-7350K vs EPYC 7502
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core i3-7350K vs EPYC 7502 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7350K vs EPYC 7502 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7350K vs EPYC 7502 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-7350K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7502 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rome |
60 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |