In Atomfall, the Core i3-7350K is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 60 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7350K vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7350K vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7350K vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7350K Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
