In Atomfall, the Core i3-7350K is slightly faster than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7350K
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 60 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7350K vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
90%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7350K vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7350K vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7350K Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
