Core i3-7350K vs Core i3-14100F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-7350K is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100F, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $62.41 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-7350K
- Up to 61% cheaper – $39.99 vs $102.40
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-14100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 58 vs 60 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
204
90%
Min 1% FPS
139
90%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
227
100%
Min 1% FPS
154
100%
Price, $
$102.4
39%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7350K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7350K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7350K | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 60 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
