Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-7320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7320.
Advantages of Core i3-7320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-7320 - 383 vs 347 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7320 - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7320 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |