The Core i3-7300 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a better value for money, as it's $18.55 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-7300
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 25% cheaper – $56.38 vs $74.93
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
The Core i3-7300 is better in every way
Core i3-7300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$56.38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
97%
Min 1% FPS
119
97%
Price, $
$74.93
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
73%
Core i3-7300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-7300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
