In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
99%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
