In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is same performance as the Ryzen 5 2600. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $75 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 75% cheaper – $25.00 vs $99.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.45/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 19, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
