In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the FX-8370. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $227 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 90% cheaper – $25.00 vs $252.02
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $1.30/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8370
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 193 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
94%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
193 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
9%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
10%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
