In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $538 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 231 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 96% cheaper – $25.00 vs $563.41
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 96% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.10 vs $2.65/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 8 years and 11 days newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 11 days newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
212 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
92%
Price, $
$563.41
4%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
4%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
