In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 10 days newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 10 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
