In Rust, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i7-930 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $282 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 217 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 92% cheaper – $25.00 vs $307.29
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $1.47/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
83%
Price, $
$307.29
8%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
