In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i7-8700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $169 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 87% cheaper – $25.00 vs $194.00
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-8700K
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
172 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
96%
Price, $
$194
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
