In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i7-8700 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $113 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 231 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 82% cheaper – $25.00 vs $137.66
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.10 vs $0.60/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
227 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
98%
Price, $
$137.66
18%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
