In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-820QM
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 247 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
231 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
94%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $546.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
