In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is same performance as the Core i7-4930MX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 35 vs 57 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Core i7-4930MX
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4930MX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4930MX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4930MX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-4930MX
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4930MX Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $1,096.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 57 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
