In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4790 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $75 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 75% cheaper – $25.00 vs $99.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $0.56/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Core i7-4790
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4790: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
178 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
97%
Price, $
$99.99
25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4790 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4790 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4790 May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $312.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
