In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4702HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 35 vs 37 Watts
- Consumes up to 5% less energy
Core i7-4702HQ
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4702HQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4702HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-4702HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-4702HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4702HQ May 27th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | May 27th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
