In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-3612QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-3612QM
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-3612QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
92%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-3612QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-3612QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-3612QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3612QM Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
