In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-2600. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $205 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 89% cheaper – $25.00 vs $229.95
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $1.18/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-2600
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-2600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
94%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2600 Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
