In Rust, the Core i3-7100T is slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 24% faster in Rust – 269 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
217 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
57%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
