In Rust, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $123 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 83% cheaper – $25.00 vs $148.08
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $0.64/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 229 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
216 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
84%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.08
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
