In Rust, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $51 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 67% cheaper – $25.00 vs $76.23
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $0.34/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-7600
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 223 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
216 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
91%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.23
32%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
32%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
