In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-760. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $45 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 64% cheaper – $25.00 vs $70.04
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.31/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-760
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-760: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.04
35%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-760 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-760 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
