In Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-7500T. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $34 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 58% cheaper – $25.00 vs $59.00
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege – $0.04 vs $0.10/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Core i5-7500T
- Up to 1% faster in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege – 576 vs 570 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-7500T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
570 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
362 FPS
99%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
576 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
365 FPS
100%
Price, $
$59
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
