In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-650. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $38 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 61% cheaper – $25.00 vs $63.33
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $0.31/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
91%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
39%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
