In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i5-6400 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $75 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jul 02, 2015
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Up to 75% cheaper – $25.00 vs $99.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $0.55/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-6400
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-6400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
99%
Price, $
$99.99
25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-6400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-6400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-6400 Jul 2nd, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
