In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-3570K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $49 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 66% cheaper – $25.00 vs $74.25
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Core i5-3570K
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 193 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3570K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
95%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.25
33%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3570K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3570K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3570K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $212.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
