In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3350P. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 201 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 35 vs 69 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-3350P
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3350P: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3350P in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3350P in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3350P
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3350P Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 69 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
