In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3340M and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $29 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer
- Up to 54% cheaper – $25.00 vs $54.04
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $0.28/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall
Core i5-3340M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3340M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
191 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
95%
Price, $
$54.04
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3340M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-3340M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
