In Starfield, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-13600K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $346 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 93% cheaper – $25.00 vs $371.00
- Up to 93% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in Starfield – $0.27 vs $3.82/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in Starfield
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-13600K
- Up to 7% faster in Starfield – 97 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Starfield
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-13600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
91 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
80%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
97 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$371
6%
Value, $/FPS
$3.82/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-13600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-13600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13600K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
