In Rust, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-13420H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i5-13420H
- Up to 13% faster in Rust – 247 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-13420H: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
71%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-13420H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-13420H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
46%
Core i5-13420H
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13420H Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1744 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
