In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-7100T is slightly faster than the Core i5-11600K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $174 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 87% cheaper – $25.00 vs $199.00
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
94%
Price, $
$199
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
